.
North America
United States
16 June 2026 10:23 am Questions have emerged, speculations intensified over a reconstruction package - over reports that Iran could gain access to a reported $300 billion reconstruction fund potentially financed by Gulf Arab countries if it complies with the terms of of a proposed US-Iran peace agreement. During an interview with CBS News, US Vice President Vance said such benefits would be conditional, could be available only if Iran fulfils its commitments under the deal. Vance also sought to draw a distinction between direct payments and economic relief through sanctions removal. According to Vance, the main incentive being discussed involves easing sanctions rather than direct financial transfers from Washington. "We are willing to give significant sanctions relief if the Iranians make the kind of long-term commitments that are necessary to be a normal country, to give up their nuclear weapons program, and to stop funding terrorist activities all over the Middle East," he added. Speaking after arriving in France for the G7 Summit, US President Trump said a memorandum of understanding designed to end the conflict had already been signed by both countries. "The deal's all signed. And the strait is already partially opened," Trump told reporters, referring to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. While reports have suggested the agreement may include reconstruction assistance, sanctions relief and the release of frozen Iranian assets, the full text of the memorandum has not yet been made public. The exact structure, source and conditions attached to any reconstruction funding remain unclear. Trump has repeatedly criticised the Obama administration's settlement of a decades-old dispute involving a $1.7 billion payment to Iran, arguing it effectively amounted to handing cash to Tehran. While acknowledging the possibility of economic incentives, Trump strongly denied reports that the US would directly provide money to Iran, calling them fake news. On Truth Social, the president stressed that any sanctions relief would depend on Iran's behaviour and implementation of its commitments. More details are expected after the planned official signing ceremony take place in Geneva on Friday. President Trump said the text of the agreement could be released shortly afterward. (Source: Outlook India)
Jun 16, 2026, 10:39 am The United States and Iran have entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to end their hostilities, with the U.S. administration confirming that the agreement will pave the way for the resumption of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) nuclear inspections in Iran. In an interview with NBC News on June 15 (local time), U.S. Vice President Vance emphasized that a cornerstone of the agreement involves the IAEA and the United States assisting Iran in dismantling its stockpiles of highly enriched nuclear material, a provision explicitly mandated in the memorandum. The current arrangement follows a scenario where Iran's nuclear framework has been effectively dismantled, requiring a formal pledge that prevents its reconstitution. The Vice President noted that nuclear inspections are highly anticipated to commence on June 19, adding that Iran would receive reciprocal benefits provided it remains in strict compliance with the terms. He also acknowledged the diplomatic contributions of Qatar and Pakistan in mediating the breakthrough. Regarding the controversial transit fees proposed for the Strait of Hormuz, Vance confirmed that the agreement guarantees free, unhindered access through the vital waterway during the 60-day period designated for final contract negotiations. He downplayed Iran's stated plans to impose service fees on traversing commercial vessels, attributing the rhetoric to certain Iranian factions seeking to exaggerate their domestic gains. Iranian President Pezeshkian offered a measured perspective via social media platform X, framing the MOU as a pivotal stepping stone toward halting the conflict and initiating structured dialogue, while reminding the public that negotiations toward a final accord remain ongoing. Addressing the delay in releasing the text of the memorandum, Vance clarified that the parties are currently fine-tuning technical implementation details rather than amending the core document itself. The full text of the bilateral MOU is scheduled to be made public following an official signing ceremony in Switzerland on June 19. (Source: Asia Today – South Korea)
16.06.26, 07:34 AM A U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber, the eight-engine, jet-powered aircraft, built to carry nuclear and conventional bombs, was on a routine test mission when it crashed on the runway at Edwards Air Force Base in Southern California's Mojave Desert, about 161 km north of Los Angeles, immediately after leaving the ground yesterday, bursting into flames and killing all eight crew members aboard, Air Force Colonel Hayes said at a press conference hours later. He said the "mixed crew" aboard the aircraft consisted of government civilians, contractors and uniformed military personnel. The flight was intended to support a radar modernization program, Hayes told reporters. "After reviewing footage of the crash, it was deemed to be unrecoverable and unsurvivable,’ Hayes said. The cause of the crash was unknown and under investigation, he added. Edwards, a sprawling test flight facility established in the 1930s around a dry lake bed, occupies about 1,245 square km of the Mojave desert, making it the Air Force's largest airfield. The B-52 Stratofortress, designed and built by Boeing, is a long-range, subsonic aircraft that has long served as the backbone of the U.S. crewed strategic bomber force. The swept-wing aircraft is capable of carrying munitions, including cluster bombs, gravity bombs, precision-guided missiles and nuclear warheads at altitudes of up to 15,166 m, according to an Air Force fact sheet. In a conventional conflict, the B-52 can perform strategic attack, close-air support, air interdiction, offensive counter-air and maritime operations, the fact sheet said. Monday's incident marked the first crash of a B-52 Stratofortress since the same type of bomber crashed on the island of Guam in May 2016. All seven crew members aboard that aircraft survived. Only H models of the B-52 remain in the Air Force inventory. The aircraft involved in Monday's crash was assigned to the 412th Test Wing, which is based at Edwards. Most B-52s are stationed in North Dakota and Louisiana. (Source: The Telegraph - India / Reuters - United Kingdom)
01:36, 15/06/2026, Monday Update: 01:41, 15/06/2026, Monday US President Trump announced on Sunday that a comprehensive peace agreement with Iran has been finalized. "The Deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. Congratulations to all!," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "I hereby fully authorize the toll free opening of the Strait of Hormuz, and, simultaneously herewith, authorize the immediate removal of the United States Naval blockade." "Ships of the World, start your engines. Let the oil flow!" He did not provide additional details regarding the agreement's implementation timeline. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced on X early today that both sides have agreed to the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon. He added that the official signing ceremony is scheduled to take place on June 19 in Switzerland. (Source: Yeni Şafak / Anadolu Agency - Turkey)
June 14, 2026 2:12PM ET Levin is one of President Trump's most reliable media defenders and a leading hawk on the Iran war. With Trump now moving to wind the conflict down and cut a deal that delivers Iran sweeping economic relief, Trump's loyal attack dog turns on him over secretive new deal. Levin has shifted from cheerleader to skeptic - joining a chorus of hawks bristling at an outcome they spent months warning against. As Trump pushes to finalize the agreement today - his 80th birthday - the conservative radio host pressed in a post on X today for transparency on the memorandum of understanding the administration says it will sign with Iran. The complaint lands Trump declared on Truth Social that the deal was scheduled to get signed and that the Strait of Hormuz would be "OPEN TO ALL" immediately afterward, casting it as a barrier to a nuclear-armed Iran. The details of the deal itself remain murky. Iran has repeatedly cautioned against speculation about the timing and contents, and its Fars news agency reported the strait would stay under Tehran's control, dismissing Trump's open to all claim as incomplete and inconsistent with reality. Trump, for his part, has denied Iran's account of the terms. According to Reuters and other outlets, the draft would have Iran reopen the strait while the U.S. lifts its naval blockade, releases roughly $25 billion in frozen Iranian assets - including direct cash transfers - waives oil sanctions and holds off on new ones, with broader nuclear talks pushed to a later phase. As the fighting moved toward a truce, Levin declared on his show, ’I hate this word ceasefire,’ and argued that Iran should be forced to sign a surrender document. Unconditional surrender. After an earlier ceasefire, he warned on Hannity's program to make no mistake: they are the enemy, insisting the regime would not be contained if there's not regime change. Also today, Levin wrote: ’Iran’s Hezbollah continues firing missiles into Israel. This is precisely what I and others have been warning about’. He has been just as dismissive of the diplomacy itself, calling Iran's proposals an absolute disaster and branding reported drafts of the deal disastrous, warning that an agreement along those lines would let the Iranian regime survive. That hard line has put Levin crosswise not only with the president he usually defends but with parts of Trump's own base - figures like Bannon have accused him of undermining Trump's peace posture and quietly siding with the neocon hawks the MAGA movement claims to reject. (Source: Raw Story – U.S.)
June 14, 2026 10:34 p.m. ET “Let the oil flow!” With those words on Sunday evening, US President Trump announced that the United States had reached an agreement to end the war with Iran and open the Strait of Hormuz. Shortly after, Iranian officials confirmed that the two sides had finalized a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that would remove the US naval blockade of Iranian ports and extend the current ceasefire. What we know - and still don’t know - about the deal, what it all means, and what to expect next? Experts react: We do not know the full details of what is in the MOU between Iran and the United States to date - a fourteen-point plan that codifies the tenuous ceasefires in Iran and Lebanon and outlines areas for future negotiations. It will most likely temporarily reduce violence, increase maritime traffic. There are structural incentives in the United States, Iran, and Israel that will make a second phase difficult to achieve. To date, the United States hasn’t shown the patience necessary to complete a complicated nuclear deal that requires new monitoring and verification measures. Creative solutions are also needed for an overlapping sanctions regime to prevent a return to a nuclear deal. An MOU, without any follow-on deal, will be volatile and impossible to sustain on its own. There must be a further understanding regarding the Strait of Hormuz to ensure the resumption of maritime commerce - or else the United States could easily slip back into war with Iran. Likewise, Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei may not want to do anything beyond a small, transactional deal with the United States, given Trump’s withdrawal from the Obama administration’s deal in 2018 and the fact that the United States and Israel killed Khamenei’s father, mother, wife, and son. It’s possible Iran agrees to terms that are wildly in Iran’s favor, but those are likely to be so unpalatable in the United States and Israel that a deal is extremely unlikely, it does not appear to resolve the core issues surrounding the mechanics of the Strait of Hormuz, Iranian nuclear concessions, or Iranian financial incentives and sanctions relief, supposed to be addressed in a second phase. Meanwhile, Israel appears opposed to any deal and will use its influence to block or undermine one - especially if the terms are bad. * US military action over the past year (Midnight Hammer and Epic Fury) has succeeded in degrading Iran’s nuclear program, conventional military, political leadership, and defense-industrial capacity. Trump may succeed, ’in defanging one of the world’s most dangerous terrorist states in exchange for several months of higher energy prices. That is a good trade’. The major downside cost has been Iran’s threats to the Strait of Hormuz and the US retaliatory blockade, which have choked off global energy flows, leading to higher energy prices and a global economic shock. The deal announced this weekend promises to alleviate this economic pressure. Both sides have a strong economic incentive to get energy flowing to global markets. The US doesn’t actually need a nuclear deal with Iran. Iran’s nuclear program no longer exists, and if Tehran tries to rebuild, ’the US can simply bomb again’. ** The war’s tactical achievements have not amounted to strategic success. The Iran deal is likely the best possible outcome, but it is perhaps no better than what could have been achieved had the United States pursued diplomacy rather than war in the first place. The Trump administration decimated key elements of Iran’s military power. Despite these tactical successes and the elimination of key Iranian leaders, the war was a strategic failure. Since the United States launched this war, its strategic objectives have changed. It has ultimately failed to bring regime change and instead strengthened the hand of the hardliners. The regime remains in place, and it is emboldened after its retaliation throughout the Gulf. The ability to close the Strait of Hormuz is a potent weapon that Iran will threaten to wield in the future. The war may have persuaded the Iranian leadership that a nuclear deterrent is the best way to safeguard its future. There is a possibility that this ceasefire could pave the way for a more permanent deal, but it is more likely this will be a temporary and fragile understanding that will, in the best-case scenario, prevent renewed war through the end of this administration. *** The end not just of war, but also of a strategic assumption. A US-Iran agreement will likely bring to an end, at least for the foreseeable future, the long-standing expectation in parts of Jerusalem and Washington that sustained pressure could lead to regime change in Tehran. It would amount to the collapse of a broader strategic assumption: that coordinated American and Israeli pressure could generate conditions conducive to fundamental political change inside Iran. From Israel’s perspective, the conditions appeared unusually favorable for change. Israel operated with unprecedented military freedom and the support of the world’s most powerful military ally. The Iranian leadership could emerge from its most significant test in decades having demonstrated resilience, retained control, and shown a willingness to absorb substantial costs while preserving core regime interests. Such an outcome is likely to reinforce the confidence of the ruling elite rather than weaken it. The campaign that many hoped would weaken or even destabilize the Islamic Republic will instead conclude with the regime intact, strengthened, and formally engaged by the United States. Moreover, Tehran stands to gain several important advantages: economic relief, renewed diplomatic legitimacy through engagement with Washington, and a perception that American leverage over Iran has diminished relative to what it was at the outset of the crisis. The broader strategic consequence is that today’s decision reduces the likelihood of renewed large-scale conflict in the immediate future while simultaneously strengthening the Iranian regime’s regional and international position. Unresolved issues, particularly those related to Lebanon and regional security arrangements, could still complicate implementation. Assuming maritime routes remain open and regional escalation is contained, negotiations will inevitably return to the nuclear file. Neither Iran’s missile program nor its network of regional partners is likely to be central to any near-term agreement. It also risks increasing Israel’s diplomatic isolation on the Iran issue, particularly as Gulf Arab states increasingly prioritize de-escalation, economic stability, and a durable ceasefire over continued confrontation. From Tehran’s perspective, such a result would constitute a significant strategic achievement. Iran’s ability to impose risks on global markets, combined with the practical limitations of eliminating or removing its nuclear infrastructure through force alone, pushed all sides toward negotiation. The result is an agreement that underscores a growing divergence between Washington and Jerusalem. For the United States, the agreement may represent a pathway to regional stabilization.Iran would preserve critical strategic capabilities, maintain its influence across multiple theaters - including the increasingly interconnected Lebanese and Iranian fronts. It would retain its ability to threaten vital maritime chokepoints and global energy flows, a source of leverage that remains central to its regional strategy. Military pressure imposed significant costs on Iran, but it did not produce the political transformation that some anticipated - operational success does not automatically translate into strategic success. For Israel, it may be seen as confirmation that military achievements alone were insufficient to achieve the broader strategic objectives that guided the campaign from the outset. Israel may continue to view such an arrangement with deep skepticism. Its ability to prevent the outcome appears increasingly limited. **** (Source: Atlantic Council - U.S.)
* By Swanson, a resident senior fellow and director of the Iran Strategy Project at the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative. Beginning in 2015, he served as a senior advisor on Iran policy to successive administrations, including most recently as director for Iran at the US National Security Council;
** by Kroenig, vice president for geostrategy and senior director of the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security. He previously served in the US Department of Defense and the intelligence community during the Bush, Obama, and Trump administrations;
*** by Taylor, director of the Atlantic Council’s Iraq Initiative. She served most recently as deputy assistant secretary of state for Iraq and Iran during the Biden and Trump administrations;
**** by Citrinowicz, a nonresident fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Middle East programs, a fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies. He previously served for twenty-five years in Israel Defense Intelligence, including as the head of the Iran branch in the Research and Analysis Division.
11:03, 14/06/2026, Sunday US President Trump announced yesterday on his Truth Social platform, that a comprehensive agreement with Iran is scheduled to be signed today, declaring that the Strait of Hormuz would reopen to global shipping „to all” immediately after the accord is finalized. He characterized the agreement as a wall to a nuclear weapon. Trump said that Tehran no longer wants such a weapon and ’nor will they have one, either through purchase, development, or any other form of procurement,’ emphasizing that no money will exchange hands with Tehran under the deal. ’At the appropriate time, when all is calm, we will go in and get the Nuclear Dust, buried deep under the powerful sunken granite mountains, thanks to our beautiful B-2 Bombers and their brilliant pilots, and downblend and destroy it, whether in Iran, or the United States,’ he said. US officials told Axios the signing will take place virtually. Pakistan confirmed progress toward finalization. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, whose country mediated an April ceasefire in the US-Israeli war on Iran, said earlier yesterday that the deal could be finalized within 24 hours. Iranian officials denied the today timeline was fixed. ’We will have to wait and see about the exact time of signing the memorandum; although it will not be tomorrow, the possibility of this happening in the coming days cannot be ruled out,’ Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Baghaei said. (Source: Yeni Şafak / Anadolu Agency = Turkey)
08:48-14 June 2026 AD The United States and Iran said they were close to reaching a deal toward ending the war. A deal would cap a week of diplomatic talks punctuated by airstrikes and Israel’s ongoing campaign in southern Lebanon. Both the US and Iran have sought to frame the emerging deal as a diplomatic victory. US officials signaled on Friday that a potential framework deal could be signed within days. Iran’s foreign minister, Araghchi, has said that an agreement had never been closer. Tehran and Washington have agreed to a preliminary deal that would end the fighting, reopen the crucial Strait of Hormuz for the passage of ships and lift the US naval blockade on Iranian ports in the Gulf. The United States has not confirmed these details. The agreement appears to push many of the thorniest issues to a 60-day negotiation period, including Iran’s nuclear program. For that period, the war would stop on all fronts, including Lebanon, Iran and countries in the region would discuss the future management of the strait. Iranian officials said the next phase of talks would include discussion of the lifting of American sanctions, including on Iran’s oil sales and international banking transactions, in exchange for concessions on the Iranian nuclear program. Speaking on state television Friday, Araghchi said there would be a two-part agreement to end the war: The first would be the signing of a memorandum of understanding between Tehran and Washington, and the second would be for a lasting peace deal. Araghchi added that the Strait of Hormuz would reopen as part of the initial agreement between the US and Iran, but the economically vital waterway would not return to its prewar status. He told Iranian state television that all commercial ships would be guaranteed safe passage, but said Tehran would maintain its control of the passage and would eventually charge a service fee for vessels passing through, an arrangement the Trump administration had previously warned against. The nuclear issue has been left for the second round and a final agreement, Araghchi said. According to US officials and diplomats, there are four major points of negotiation on a nuclear agreement between the United States and Iran: The United States has demanded for months that Iran agree to conduct no uranium enrichment for at least 20 years. The Iranians have countered by offering a 10-year halt, but American officials believe Tehran would settle for 15 years. The United States would work with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN inspection body, to dilute or downblend Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium. American officials envision an active role in handling the nuclear material. Iranian officials say the United States would serve only as an observer. Secretary of State Rubio has said repeatedly in recent weeks that any agreement would have to cover all 11 tons of enriched uranium in Iran’s possession, not just the half-ton of near-bomb-grade fuel. The Iranians have not talked publicly about whether they are willing to give up their entire existing stockpile. But if it was downblended, rather than shipped outside the country, Iran’s leaders could say they still have possession of the fuel. The United States has demanded that Iran dismantle its three major nuclear sites at Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan. The United States struck all three nearly a year ago, severely damaging them. Iran has discussed dismantling two facilities but insists on leaving one open, in part to demonstrate it has not surrendered what it views as a right to enrich. That could prove problematic: Critics of the Obama-era nuclear agreement with Iran focused on its failure to close down Fordo, a deep underground site, which the Iranians later revived to produce near-bomb-grade fuel. The United States wants international inspectors to be able to conduct snap inspections, anytime and anyplace inside Iran. It is not clear if the Iranian government will agree. Many of the nuclear sites are inside Revolutionary Guards military bases, where inspectors have frequently been barred at the gates. (Source: Asharq Al-Awsat - headquartered in London, England, owned by a member of the Saudi royal Family / The New York Times - U.S.)
(Saturday), June 13, 2026 'Iran launched multiple one-way attack drones in an attempt to strike commercial ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz,' US Central Command (CENTCOM), which oversees operations in the region, posted on X. US forces have downed several Iranian drones, the military said late yesterday. CENTCOM insisted that the strait remains open for transit. (Source: The Times - Kuwait)
Jun 11, 2026 07:59 IST US released footage of Tomahawk missiles launched at Iran overnight. The missile launches come amid one of the most serious US-Iran confrontations in years, with both sides trading strikes and warnings. Speaking to Fox News, US President Trump said 49 Tomahawk missiles were used to strike targets deep inside Iran, with some as close as 64 km from Tehran. He also said US fighter jets were operating over Iran and were taking out radar and air defence systems in the south-western part of the country, close to the Persian Gulf. According to the US Central Command (CENTCOM), the missiles were launched at multiple targets beginning at 3:45 am IST. Local media reports said the latest strikes hit western Tehran, Fars province, Bandar Abbas, Qeshm Island, Kish, Minab and parts of central Isfahan. The escalation widened as Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC, said its aerospace force and navy had launched a two-wave operational strike on US forces in the region, targeting 18 key installations at bases hosting American troops. The IRGC also said it had closed the Strait of Hormuz to all vessels, including oil tankers and commercial ships. CENTCOM disputed that claim and said commercial traffic was continuing through the waterway despite the fresh hostilities. Fox also reported that Trump said top Iranian officials had called him and asked the US to stop the bombing. He further said that if Tehran did not sign the peace deal proposed by US negotiators, American forces would bomb again tomorrow night, reportedly using an expletive while making the threat. IRGC Aerospace Force commander Brigadier General Mousavi said Iran would respond across the region. ’We will bring the region into hell for you from across Iran if you make the sacred Strait of Hormuz unsafe,’ he said. Iranian media, citing senior officials, also said Trump’s claim that he had directly spoken by phone with senior Iranian officials was false and that there had been no such communication between the two sides. (Source: India Today)
June 11, 2026 12:39 AM The United States and Iran traded air attacks today for a second straight day. The escalation in hostilities began after Monday's downing of a U.S. Apache helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz, which sparked a series of tit-for-tat attacks across Iran and on U.S. bases around the region. Early yesterday, the U.S. military said its latest attacks targeted military surveillance capabilities, communication systems, and air defense sites around the Strait of Hormuz, in response to what it called Tehran's ’unwarranted and continued aggression.’ President Trump has repeatedly said a deal is close, though there has been no sign of a breakthrough, while also threatening to resume bombing. Yesterday evening Trump told that he would resume heavy bombing if Iran's leaders did not sign immediately an agreement with the United States. The military's Central Command announced the strikes were complete about four hours after they began, soon after midnight in Tehran. Oil prices rose nearly $3 following Trump's threat of escalation, and extended gains in early Asian trade today. The conflict has become a political headache for the White House, with polls showing Trump's approval ratings sinking amid voter anger over high gasoline prices. Iranian news agencies reported explosions in several cities across the country of 93 million, including Sirik, Kargan, Bandar Abbas, Minab, and Karaj near the strait, as well as Varamin far to the north, closer to the Caspian Sea. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it had launched counter-attacks on 18 U.S. military targets at airbases in Kuwait and Bahrain, as well as the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet in Bahrain. It later said it had also targeted the al-Azraq air base in Jordan for a second night running, firing 12 ballistic missiles at the U.S. base. Kuwait's air defences were engaging hostile aerial targets, the U.S. ally's army said, while Bahraini air defences intercepted and destroyed Iranian aerial attacks, a media adviser to Bahrain's king said on X. Iran accused the U.S. of striking reservoirs that supplied drinking water to 10 villages and violating international law. It is a calculated war crime and a flagrant violation of human rights, said foreign ministry spokesperson Baghei. Iran's top joint military command also warned it would fire on any vessel trying to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, which has been largely closed for months. Fighting continued in a parallel war in Lebanon between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah militants. Tehran's demands include an end to Israel's attacks in Lebanon, the lifting of sanctions on Iran, the release of billions of dollars in frozen assets, and recognition of its control of the strait. Trump says Iran must end its restrictions on shipping through Hormuz. He also says any peace deal must ensure Iran cannot develop a nuclear weapon. Iran denies any such ambition. Hezbollah claimed fresh attacks against Israeli forces. Israeli airstrikes in southern Lebanon killed at least 13 people yesterday. (Source: Miami Herald - U.S. / Reuters - United Kingdom)
(10 June 2026) 16.58 CEST Musk has rejected claims that he is to blame for inciting disorder in Belfast. In a post on X, the platform he owns, Musk retweeted a post from Goodwin, the Reform UK candidate at the recent Gorton and Denton byelection, saying: It’s not social media that’s inflaming tensions. It’s not Musk. It’s not Farage. It’s not the ‘far-right’. It is the very deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration & open borders. This policy has to end or it will destroy Western nations. Musk added his own comment on Goodwin’s tweet, saying: “Exactly.” (Source: The Guardian - United Kingdom)
NATO
June 15, 2026, 12:11 AM The end of Trans-Atlanticism as an ideology. It’s over. But the relationship is not. (Source: Foreign Policy – U.S.)
12/06/2026 - 16: 30 GMT+2 The Trump administration informed NATO allies last year it would cut military assets available to Europe even during times of war or invasion. The details of exactly how the Pentagon intends to scale back access to such assets were unclear until now. As part of its wider plan to pull out of Europe's security architecture, the US is planning to withdraw access to deep strike capabilities for NATO allies. Everything linked to deep strike capabilities will be cut. This includes US long-range bombers such as the B2 and B-52. Naval assets, including missile-launching submarine and aircraft carriers, will also be withdrawn and re-directed to other theatres. According to reporting from the New York Times, the US is also planning on reducing the number of F-16 and F-15E fighter jets available to NATO from roughly 150 to 100 and maritime reconnaissance aircraft from 26 to 15, as well as withdrawing all eight aerial refuelling tanker jets previously available to Europe. The significant changes to US commitments are being undertaken within NATO’s so-called Force Model system, which allows allies and military planners identify troops and capabilities available to NATO operations based on deterrence and threat assessment. Confirming its plans, the US European Command said in a statement last week that it would “right size” its contributions to the NATO Force Model. Senior officials have publicly downplayed the implications, arguing that European allies are now contributing far more to the continent’s deterrence and will be able to compensate for gap left by the US. The move comes at a particularly tense moment, with US Trump increasingly angry at NATO allies over their refusal to join in the US and Israel's war in Iran. Spain, Italy and France refused to allow US planes headed for Iran to use their airspace and bases on their territory. Since then, a coalition of NATO allies and other countries including South Korea and Australia have been formulating a strategy to reopen the strait once hostilities come to an end, with several countries sending frigates and personnel to the region for pre-positioning ahead of the war's end – though it remains unclear when that might come. “The solution would be to open the Strait of Hormuz," Trump wrote on social media in March, complaining allies don’t want to help and warning that “Without the U.S.A., NATO IS A PAPER TIGER!”. “COWARDS,” he concluded. “We will REMEMBER!” (Source: Euronews - based in Lyon, France)
South America
Argentina
13 June 2026 1:00pm BST President Milei’s hope is that foreign investors and executives will flock to his freshly deregulated economy. He proposes to grant legal status to “non-human corporations”: businesses that are run entirely by artificial intelligence (AI). If fully automated, they might not have any human staff or shareholders whatsoever. Machine-run companies could “own assets, hire employees, participate in international trade, sue you in court and even donate to political campaigns – all without a single human’s input or liability”, the histoian Harari says. Milei’s proposal’s meaning: companies with no directors and a free-for-all for bots setting up businesses. He has described the measure as “an invitation”, and some tech bros are apparently already taking him up on it. Altman’s OpenAI is looking at investing up to $25bn (£19bn) in data centres in Patagonia. Billionaire Thiel, the cofounder of PayPal and Palantir, has reportedly bought a house in Buenos Aires. Thousands of digital nomads are reported to be arriving in Thiel’s slipstream, attracted to Milei’s technofuturism and his libertarian politics. “Don’t be surprised if Argentina becomes the next [AI] global hub,” Milei said in December. Since he took office at the end of 2023, his take-no-prisoners reform programme has tamed Argentina’s runaway inflation and stabilised the economy. Milei announced his world-first legal concept in an opinion piece in the Financial Times. ’As much as the industrial revolution freed us from the constraints of the human muscle, AI will free us from the constraints of the human brain, pushing productivity beyond our wildest dreams,’ he wrote last week. If entities operated by AI agents or robots were to succeed, he said, they needed to be able to take risks. And this meant they needed the same limited liability laws, shielding them from open-ended risks and costs, as those enjoyed by human entrepreneurs. This legal framework had allowed the 17th-century Dutch East India Company to take the risks that helped launch the industrial revolution, he said. It would now do the same for the AI companies that will drive the tech revolution. “Let Buenos Aires become for AI what Amsterdam was for the age of sail – the place where the legal imagination caught up with the technological moment, and the world was changed,” he declared. Four days after Milei’s pitch, the historian Harari published a response. In January, he recalled, he had told the World Economic Forum in Davos that governments might one day grant AI models legal personhood. Yet ’I never imagined that ‘one day’ would come around a mere four months later’. He cited studies showing that AI programs will often cheat when facing the prospect of losing a game. For an AI-run company, bankruptcy is “the equivalent to its death”, so ’it would presumably be willing to do anything to avoid that fate’. The machines will also be superior to humans at using legal loopholes and regulatory arbitrage. And it will not be easy to deter them from engaging in downright illegal activities, because the ultimate sanction that deters human executives and employees – jail – is irrelevant to AIs, he said. The International Monetary Fund last month endorsed Milei’s programme with another $1bn of funding. This week, credit rating agency S&P also raised its grade for Argentinian debt, making it more investable. The biggest question, though, is whether Milei’s zealous ambitions might let the AI genie out of the bottle. (Source: The Telegraph – United Kingdom)
Venezuela
13 June 2026 08:58 (UTC +04:00) US President Trump has announced on his Truth Social account that, on his orders and in coordination with Venezuela, US authorities carried out a lethal strike against the leader of the Tren de Aragua criminal group, Guerrero. „Early in my Administration, I delivered on my promise to designate Tren de Aragua as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, deport thousands of evil criminals, and wage war against the Cartels, who have long been waging war against our Citizens, while weak leaders left America helpless and defensive. This action was coordinated closely with our friends in Venezuela, with whom we are working very well. As a result, Tren de Aragua terrorists no longer have safe haven in Venezuela or anywhere else and, under my leadership, we will find these vicious murderers and drugs lords anytime, anyplace, and send them to the depths of hell where they belong. (Source: APA - Azerbaijan)
Global
June 15, 2026, 12:13 AM The End of Neoliberalism. The virtues it extolled - cosmopolitanism and competition - led to its demise. (Source: Foreign Policy - U.S.)
By Milanovic, a research professor at the City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate Center.
June 15, 2026, 12:10 AM The end of climate politics. As the West debated a green energy future, Beijing was building it. (Source: Foreign Policy - U.S.)
By Aronowsky, an assistant professor at the Columbia Climate School.
(Monday), June 15, 2026 6:25 AM ET Crude oil prices are down sharply today morning, after President Trump, Iranian leaders and Pakistani negotiators all indicated that a deal to end the war with Iran will be signed on Friday *. Prices had already fallen significantly on Thursday and Friday in anticipation of a deal. Trump posted online about the deal yesterday evening. Throughout this conflict, oil prices have repeatedly fallen on headlines promising an imminent deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz; however, they've never dropped this low. Cheaper crude oil should push U.S. gasoline prices down, which should in turn help with high levels of inflation - but gasoline remains more than a dollar higher than the prewar average. The war in Iran had driven the national average price up by as much as $1.50 a gallon. Oil futures prices promptly sank around 4% after markets reopened for trading following their typical weekend break. By today, prices were down nearly 13% from where they had been in the middle of last week. The cost of one barrel of Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, was around $83, and West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, around $80. At one point in this conflict, global oil prices had touched $126 a barrel. Oil prices remain elevated compared with prewar prices, which were in the $60s. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who has played a central role negotiating between the U.S. and Iran, has confirmed that a deal has been reached. This is more than another short-lived diplomatic cycle: Washington has an incentive to avoid a spike in gasoline prices ahead of the midterms, Tehran is seeking sanctions relief and restored export revenues, the global economy has a strong interest in keeping the Strait of Hormuz open - these incentives align in a coherent way, and that is the strongest argument that, wrote Galimberti, the chief economist for the research firm Rystad Energy, in a note. A reopening of the strait would begin to reduce global inflationary pressures, which have been mounting. Before the war began, the world had been oversupplied with oil, which was keeping prices ’low’. Returning to normal will mean returning to that status quo. It's not obvious that we'll be in a surplus anytime soon. A rapid reopening of the strait would ease pressure on the world's oil consumers, particularly in Asia and Europe, but it would not mean an immediate return to prewar oil supply levels and prices, because some oil and natural gas production fields and refineries have been taken offline or damaged in the conflict. The ship’s transit takes time too. The world has tapped into its stockpiles of oil to make up for missing supplies; refilling those inventories could keep upward pressure on oil prices for months. (Source: NPR - U.S.)
* Friday, June 19
.