.
Europe
Belgium
September 10, 2025 The U.S. has been struggling with fentanyl, a synthetic drug estimated to be 50 times stronger than heroin. According to estimates from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 80,000 people died from drug overdoses in 2024, a significant decrease from the 110,000 deaths recorded the previous year. U.S. President Trump is taking drastic international action to target cartels and designated them as foreign terrorist organizations. U.S. homeland security chief Noem arrived at the port of Antwerp today to pledge American support toward smashing narco gangs, as drug-fueled violence plagues Belgium. Ports here, like this one, are a crime target for foreign terrorist organizations, Noem said during a press conference following a meeting with Belgian Prime Minister De Wever. “There’s a plague of fentanyl traffic that is spreading around the world,” said Noem, adding that “we need to stop it and work together so that we have the ability to use our experience in America to help Europe.” “The U.S. understands that we need to be aggressive in fighting these organizations and we want to partner with you in an even greater way to do so into the future.” Noem noted that the collaborative action will involve sharing data and security information, and dealing with shipping companies. “I think Europe should focus a lot more on European cooperation on one hand, and on cooperation with our friends in the United States in order to crush the business model of organized crime”, said De Wever, a Flemish, who spent more than 10 years as mayor of Antwerp before becoming Belgian prime minister. Belgian authorities seized a record 121 metric tons of cocaine at the port in 2023.The Belgian port city of Antwerp has witnessed a stark increase in drug-related shootings and explosions amid the surging drug traffic. Drug violence has gripped Brussels too, with about 60 shootings this year alone. The government is currently mulling deploying soldiers on the streets by the end of the year to deter criminals. (Source: Politico U.S.)
Denmark
12.09.2025 Denmark make largest-ever arms purchase, at over $9.1B. The eight ground-based air defense systems, acquired from arms manufacturers in France, Italy, Germany, and Norway, will each consist of four units capable of independently launching guided missiles to protect cities, military sites, and critical infrastructure across Denmark. (Source: Anadolu Agency - Turkey)
United Kingdom
(9 September 2025) It’s now been a few months since the publication of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR) and the International Security Strategy. While the strategy documents may be fine as far as they go, there is something missing in the connection between UK strategy and the world as it really is, at home and abroad. To be fair to the present government and the authors of the reviews, this realist element has been missing from UK thinking under multiple governments for many years since the end of the Cold War. We need: An explicit concept of the national interest for the new realist world; Far greater honesty about the gap between our aspirations and our current resources and organisation; A recognition that active public support rather than disinterested acquiescence will be key to achieving sharper national objectives. We certainly need a new approach today – and not just because of Trump. US policy today is as much a function of a changing world as of a new President. The rise of multipolarity on the back (particularly) of the growth of Asia and the relative decline of the West mean that even after Trump/Trumpism, US policy won’t (can’t) revert to the unipolar status quo ante. Wilsonianism and neoconservatism will never be the same again: even if their exponents return to government, their power will be much constrained. It seems inconceivable that the US public will be prepared to support and pay for the old posture. The same applies on this side of the Atlantic. Today there are as many threats as before, if not more, which the International Security Strategy sets out well. What’s changed is that we won’t be able to address them without a clear underpinning of national purpose: if there isn’t a clearly defined national interest to defend, neither our finances nor public opinion will have the staying power to sustain increased defence expenditure and national effort. We need to choose our allies and partners on the basis of national interest rather than aesthetic preferences. Talk of a 'coalition of the willing' is dangerous if we convince ourselves that 'willing' is the same as “able”. Unrealistic unipolar-era ambitions reinforced by a misplaced 'can do' mindset is even worse. BFPG’s recent survey found that the British public feel safer this year than last. They do support greater defence spending, but not at the expense of domestic priorities. In that respect, the Government’s revealed preferences (modest increases in real defence spending, but not yet) is a better reflection of public opinion than some of the rhetoric about the country moving towards 'warfighting readiness'. BFPG research also suggests that young Britons (under 35) care much more about Gaza than Ukraine and are not greatly concerned by the security implications of a closer relationship with China. On the right, there is also a fracturing between consistent supporters of Ukraine and those who believe that security begins closer to home with the need to combat illegal migration. Whatever one’s views, there is little sense here of the settled sense of national interest which informs the “whole of nation” approach to security seen in parts of Central Europe and the Baltics. (Source: The British Foreign Policy Group - based in London, United Kingdom)
Caribbean
Puerto Rico
(Monday), 9/8/2025 Defense Secretary Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Caine visited Puerto Rico today, as the Pentagon looks to intensify military operations against drug cartels based in Latin American countries. The unannounced visit follows last week’s deadly military strike against a vessel in the Caribbean Sea that President Trump said was smuggling narcotics from Venezuela and bound for the United States. Eleven ’narco-terrorists’ were killed in the operation, the president has said. Senior administration officials have forecast that additional strikes are possible, with Vice President Vance saying Saturday on social media that ’killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the highest and best use of our military.” A Department of Homeland Security document from 2020 says that the Coast Guard is the lead and only federal maritime law enforcement agency with both the authority and capability to enforce national and international law, including drug interdiction, on the high seas, and that it shares the lead for interdiction and enforcement responsibilities with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in U.S. territorial waters. Sen. Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, has raised concerns about the administration’s vision for drug interdiction. If the new policy is that we blow you up if we think you might be a drug dealer, Paul said, "that’s kind of a worrisome policy.” In announcing the strike, the president said the vessel’s crew had been positively identified as members of Tren de Aragua, a criminal group his administration has sought to connect to Venezuelan President Maduro and violent crime in the United States. He claimed later that the U.S. government has “tapes” of the suspects speaking. The Pentagon is weighing plans to make Puerto Rico a part of its operations in the region, possibly conducting military flights out of the island territory. The effort includes the possible deployment of fighter jets to the island. “This fight against drug trafficking, in which @POTUS Trump is investing, will firmly position Puerto Rico as the United States’ border in the Caribbean,” Puerto Rico Gov Colón (R). posted to social media during Hegseth’s visit. Hegseth also flew to the amphibious warship USS Iwo Jima, which is in the Caribbean as part of a buildup of warships in the region. Puerto Rico is the most obvious and nearest place to Venezuela, and its ports and airfields provide additional options for expanded military counternarcotics operations, said Berg, director of the Americas Program and head of the Future of Venezuela Initiative at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “This administration has signaled for a while that there would be paradigm shift in how we do security operations in the Western Hemisphere,” Berg said. With the strike last week, which the U.S. executed under a 2001 authorization for the use of military force after Trump designated the cartels as terrorist organizations, “they want to show it’s not just rhetorical, and show there’s different rules of engagement with these organizations now,” Berg said. The U.S. military has assembled an armada of at least eight warships in the region - effort as an “enhanced counter narcotics operation.” Military installations on Puerto Rico include Fort Allen, a National Guard training center east of Ponce, near the southern coast, and Muñiz Air National Guard Base, just east of the capital, San Juan. About 14,000 U.S. troops were deployed in response since the aftermath of Hurricanes Maria and Irma in 2017, including more than 9,300 on the ground to help with recovery, airlift supplies and assist with rebuilding. Another 4,400 personnel were involved on nearby ships, including the USNS Comfort, a hospital ship. (Source: MSN / The Washington Post = U.S.)
North America
United States
(Saturday), Sep 13, 2025 In a Senate confirmation hearing on Thursday, Veprek, Trump's nominee to run the State Department's refugee division, called for reshaping the global approach to asylum."The current framework of international agreements and norms on migration developed after the Second World War in a completely different geopolitical and economic context. It cannot be expected to function in our modern world, and indeed it does not.' While some like-minded governments may support the effort, there have been no signs of broad support for a worldwide realignment. At a meeting of the State Department's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration on Tuesday, top Trump refugee official Chretien said the Trump administration would seek to replace decades-old global accords and "build a new framework." Chretien said the top goal for the bureau - set by the highest levels of the White House - would be resettling white South Africans from the country's Dutch-descended Afrikaner minority. Trump froze refugee admissions from countries around the world when he took office in January, but weeks later called for Afrikaners to be prioritized. As of Monday, 138 in total had arrived. An internal document drafted by officials in the State Department and U.S. Health and Human Services Department in April suggested the Trump administration could also prioritize bringing in Europeans as refugees if they were targeted for expressing certain views, such as opposition to mass migration or support for populist political parties. A report in August said that Trump officials were discussing setting a refugee admission ceiling of 40,000 people in fiscal year 2026 with a heavy focus on Afrikaners. The administration has since discussed a ceiling as high as 60,00.U.S. President Trump's administration plans to call for sharply narrowing the right to asylum at the United Nations later this month. It seeks to undo the post-World War II framework around humanitarian protection. Under the proposed framework, asylum seekers would be required to claim protection in the first country they enter, not a nation of their choosing. It calls for reforming the global approach to migration worldwide and greatly limiting the ability of people to seek asylum., which 'is routinely abused to enable economic migration'. Asylum would be temporary and the host country would decide whether conditions in their home country had improved enough to return. Deputy Secretary of State Landau would lead the side event at the U.N. (Source: The Japan Times / Reuters - United Kingdom)
12.09.2025 Authorities identify suspect in Kirk killing. Utah Governor Cox says investigators believe Robinson acted alone. Family member told authorities that Robinson had become 'more political in recent years'. (Source: Anadolu Agency - Turkey)
Sep. 11, 2025 The 31-year-old Turning Point USA creator Kirk was shot dead at Utah Valley University. The event was a stop on his American Comeback Tour. The conservative influencer had just answered a question about transgender shooters when he was shot. Kirk, a rising MAGA star, is survived by his wife and two young children. The shooter is still at large. Gun recovered in Kirk assassination revealed - and ammo bore pro-trans, anti-fascist messages. (Source: The New York Post - U.S.)
3:13 a.m.· Sept. 11, 2025. President Trump shares a message on the assassination of Kirk. (Source: X – U.S.)
/Video/
8M views
(11 September 2025) "Kirk, Trump ally who opposed US aid to Ukraine, shot dead in Utah: What to know' (Source: Kyiv Post - Ukraine)
10/09/2025 In May, American energy officials had become concerned after experts found rogue communication devices in some Chinese inverters and batteries. U.S. officials say solar-powered highway infrastructure including chargers, roadside weather stations, and traffic cameras should be scanned for the presence of rogue devices – such as hidden radios – secreted inside batteries and inverters. The advisory, disseminated by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration, comes amid escalating government action over the presence of Chinese technology in America's transportation infrastructure. The August 20 advisory said the devices were used to power a range of U.S. highway infrastructure, including signs, traffic cameras, weather stations, solar-powered visitor areas and warehouses, and electric vehicle chargers. The risks it cited included simultaneous outages and surreptitious theft of data. In January, the Commerce Department finalized rules that will effectively bar nearly all Chinese cars and trucks from the U.S. market by late 2026, as part of a crackdown on vehicle software and hardware from China. (Source: MSN / The Washington Post = U.S.)
NATO
12 Sep. 2025 At a meeting of the North Atlantic Council on Wednesday (10 September 2025), Allies discussed the situation in light of Poland’s request for Article 4 consultations. Today, NATO Secretary General Rutte and Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) General Grynkewich held a joint press conference * to outline NATO’s response to the violation of Polish airspace by Russian drones two days earlier. Mr Rutte announced the launch of ’Eastern Sentry,’ a military activity aimed to bolster NATO’s posture along the eastern flank. Commencing in the coming days, Eastern Sentry will involve a range of Allied assets and feature both traditional capabilities and novel technologies, including elements designed to address challenges associated with drones. He added that Allies across Europe and North America work together every day on strengthening air defences and protecting critical undersea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. (Source: NATO - headquarters Brussels, Belgium)
* /Video/
September 12, 2025 We still don’t know what happened over Poland. The same people who have spent the last five years doing everything in their power to get the United States and NATO more directly involved in the ongoing Ukraine War are at it again. A recent incident involving upwards of 19 suspected Russian drones - specifically notoriously inaccurate Gerbera-type unmanned aerial vehicles - breaching the airspace of NATO member Poland has triggered a cascade of recriminations and accusations. The drone swarm, successfully downed by Polish and Dutch warplanes, did not cause any injuries in Poland and did not last very long in Poland’s well-defended airspace. The Kremlin has denied intentionally launching the drones at Poland. The consensus both from official NATO sources and the defense punditry class is that the Russians deliberately launched the attack at Poland’s borders as a means of testing NATO’s resolve. Multiple defense intellectuals have been brought out across Western media outlets and echoed similar talking points. Yet what precisely did Moscow have to gain from such an attack? What does the Kremlin have to gain by expanding the war in Europe at this moment? There is an anxiety today among the NATO class that Ukraine’s loss to Russia - the most likely outcome of the ongoing war - would equate to a military defeat of NATO. It would not have been the case had NATO avoided entanglement in the war in the first place. Yet Ukraine was never part of NATO, and in spite of vague future promises of a pathway to admission, was not on track to join when Russia invaded in early 2022. With this in mind, it is somewhat strange that NATO has gone as far with supporting Ukraine as it has. NATO was supposed to be a defensive military alliance committed to protecting its neighbors - not intervening in the affairs of its non-NATO neighbors, no matter how morally righteous it might believe them to be. But even if Moscow manages to subdue Ukraine, there is little evidence that it intends to trigger a wider regional war against the European defense alliance. Thus far, the Russians have largely kept their war in Ukraine confined to the Russian-speaking Eastern portions of the country, which they regard as a natural part of the “Russian world.” Since its abortive and ill-fated attempt to seize Kyiv in February 2022, Russia has refrained from launching an incursion into western Ukraine - instead creating a defensive perimeter around the Crimean Peninsula, Russia’s crown jewel on the Black Sea. As such, it is safe to say that Russia is not interested in expanding the war - and certainly not seeking to wage war directly with NATO. And what evidence does NATO have that the drones were deliberately deployed into Polish airspace as part of a larger provocation strategy by Russia? Less than 24 hours after the downing of the Russian drones, virtually every pro-NATO voice in the West has taken to the press and given nearly identical talking points about the alleged Russian attack on Poland. Some of NATO’s members in Europe are chomping at the bit to broaden NATO’s involvement in Ukraine. By ballooning this incident with the Russian drones, NATO’s supporters in Europe and America believe they can force Trump to change course on Ukraine. He shouldn’t. As Trump insists that his support for Ukraine is unwavering and that he is angry with Russian leader Putin for perceived diplomatic slights, the White House has been angling to reduce America’s military commitments to Europe. In fact, the Pentagon issued * a major strategy document indicating that the US military would be deprioritizing Europe, the Middle East, and even the Indo-Pacific in favor of Western hemispheric defense. All this is sending the European members of NATO into panic mode. Europeans accustomed to the American security umbrella view NATO as a sacrosanct entity and, without the United States being fully committed to NATO, the alliance will wither. And if NATO dies, Europe will be undefended from their bogeyman of Russia. As things stand, we don’t yet know for sure what happened in the skies above Poland. What we do know is this is not the first time something like this has happened and, in the previous instances, the incidents were either accidental or not the Kremlin’s fault. It will take weeks and months to know what precisely happened; until an investigation is conducted, the last possible thing America should be doing is jumping to conclusions that lead to a wider war and greater levels of US military commitment. So, by ballooning this incident with the Russian drones into a grand conspiracy on the part of Putin’s Russia to escalate the war against NATO, NATO’s supporters in Europe and America believe they can force Trump to fully invest in Ukraine’s defense - and in so doing to get Trump to restore the primacy of NATO in US foreign policy. (Source: The National Interest - U.S.)
By Weichert, a senior national security editor at The National Interest, who has consulted regularly with various government institutions and private organizations on geopolitical issues. His newest book, A Disaster of Our Own Making: How the West Lost Ukraine.
* At the moment, reference to: „US no longer ‘primarily focused’ on Europe’s security, says Hegseth. US defence secretary says Europe should lead in defending Ukraine and that restoring pre-2014 borders is unrealistic” (In: The Guardian, Wed 12 Feb 2025 16.00 CET)
(Thursday, 11 September 2025) Nato strengthens defences after Russian drones shot down over Poland. The Netherlands and the Czech Republic said they would send defences to Poland. The Dutch were going to deploy air defence systems, artillery and 300 troops, while the Czech would send helicopters and 100 soldiers, Polish Defence Minister Kosiniak-Kamysz said. Lithuania would receive a German brigade. Germany also said it would 'intensify its engagement along Nato's eastern border' and extend and expand air policing over Poland. Warsaw will set restrictions for drones and small air traffic along its eastern borders with Belarus and Ukraine, and Latvia has announced its eastern airspace would be closed for a week. France's Macron announced the country would send three Rafale fighter jets. 'This Russian provocation...is nothing more than an attempt to test our capabilities," Poland's President Nawrocki said, echoing comments by his German and French counterparts. Today, Nato's top military commander Grynkewich acknowledged it was not yet known whether the act had been intentional and said even the precise number of drones which had crossed into Polish airspace was still to be determined. Joint military exercises between Belarus and Russia, dubbed Zapad 2025, are due to start tomorrow. This year's exercise involve up to 30,000 troops in total, according to Lithuanian military intelligence chief Mazonas. (Source: BBC - United Kingdom)
September 10, 2025 After Poland shoots down 'huge number' of drones that violated its airspace, Secretary-General Rutte calls Russia's behavior 'reckless.' This is the first time NATO planes have engaged potential threats in allied airspace, NATO spokesman Col. O’Donnell said. NATO chief spokesperson Hart said the alliance’s 32 national envoys will discuss the matter at a planned meeting, according to the AP. (Source: Fox News - U.S.)
South America
Brazil
12.09.2025 Former Brazilian President Bolsonaro was sentenced yesterday to 27 years and three months in prison after a Supreme Court panel convicted him of attempting a coup to remain in power after his 2022 election defeat. Four of the five justices on the court's panel voted to convict Bolsonaro on five charges in the historic case. According to the prosecution, the coup plot included a plan to assassinate President Lula, his Vice President Alckmin and Supreme Court Justice Moraes using explosives, weapons or poison. Bolsonaro has been convicted of ’plotting a coup d'état, participating in an armed criminal organization, attempting to abolish Brazil's democratic order by force, committing violent acts against state institutions, and damaging protected public property during an assault on government buildings’ by his supporters on Jan. 8, 2023.The 70-year-old former president, who is currently under house arrest, has denied any wrongdoing. His lawyers have announced that they will appeal the verdict to the full Supreme Court of 11 justices. The verdict drew immediate reactions from the United States. US President Trump expressed shock at the outcome. "I thought he was a good president of Brazil, and it's very surprising that this could happen.' US Secretary of State Rubio called the verdict unfair and said the United States would respond accordingly to this witch hunt. (Source: Anadolu Agency - Turkey)
South America
September 8, 2025 From now through October 2026, Latin America will have presidential elections in seven countries: Bolivia, Chile, Honduras, Costa Rica, Peru, Colombia and Brazil. Polls indicate that left-wing candidates belonging to the Sao Paulo Forum (FSP) - established by former Cuban leader Castro and Brazil’s President Lula in 1990 are likely to face defeat. Guided by Cuba and funded by the late Venezuelan leader Chavez, the FSP evolved into a powerful platform for political parties which wield control over 11 governments across the region. Right-wing parties face risks including threats of political violence, electoral fraud and judicial interference. Since Trump’s return to the White House in 2025, regional dynamics have begun to change. His measures addressing unauthorized immigration, organized crime, trade tariffs and efforts to curb China’s influence, are reconfiguring regional politics. Socialism is losing ground while right-wing movements are gaining momentum. This shift stems from President Trump’s strategy of imposing high tariffs and sanctions to penalize his detractors, while offering low tariffs and exemptions to those he considers allies. In March, Ecuadorian President Noboa met with Mr. Trump to forge a strategic alliance. He ultimately won the second round. A key factor to the expected defeats of FSP candidates are the shortcomings of the economic policies implemented by these governments. There is a rising sense of dissatisfaction among the Latin American people, many of whom have deep Christian values, toward the progressive ideology pushed by socialists. There are also allegations regarding ties between leaders of the Sao Paulo Forum and organized crime. Venezuelan President Maduro, is accused of being the leader of the infamous Cartel of the Suns. In August, the Trump administration classified the cartel as a specially designated global terrorist organization. The general election was held in Bolivia on August 17. The leftist ruling party, Movement Toward Socialism (MAS), which had been in power for much of the past 20 years, had been defeated. The surprise frontrunner was center-right senator Pereira, who began his campaign with only 3 percent support in the opinion polls. Castillo of the MAS party received just 3.2 percent. Chile goes to the polls on November 16, with a likely runoff on December 14. There are four right wing candidates: Kast, Matthei, Parisi and Kaiser. The left is fielding a single candidate, Jara, who is affiliated with the Communist Party. According to the polling, Mr. Kast is currently leading in first-round voting intentions with 29 percent, while Ms. Jara follows behind with 25 percent. The election on the calendar is scheduled for November 30 in Honduras, where candidates compete in a single-round system. The three leading candidates are Asfura of the National Party (right) with 37.2 percent approval, Nasralla of the Liberal Party (center-right) with 33.7 percent and Moncada of the Libre Party (Sao Paulo Forum) with 28.8 percent. Mr. Asfura has promised to strengthen ties with the U.S., reestablish relations with Taiwan and utilize the skills of returning migrants to revitalize the economy. As Ms. Moncada faces the prospect of defeat, former deposed President Zelaya, leader of the Libre Party has threatened that, if necessary, he may incite violence by rallying irregular groups throughout the country. There is also a high risk of fraud. Republican Congresswoman Salazar has urged U.S. Secretary of State Rubio to ensure that the presidential elections in Honduras are free and fair. The presidential election will be held in Costa Rica on February 1, 2026, with a possible runoff on April 5. Since the current President Chaves is not eligible for reelection, the ruling Social Democratic Progress Party is looking to replace him with one of his ministers. Ms. Fernandez is leading with 24 percent of the vote. In a distant second place is right-wing candidate Alvarado with 7.2 percent, followed by centrist Ramos with 7.1 percent. The FSP-affiliated parties currently have limited support. Peru’s presidential election is set for April 12, 2026, with a potential runoff on June 7. Lima’s mayor, Aliaga is leading with 14.2 percent, followed by comedian Alvarez at 10.9 percent and Fujimori, daughter of former president, with 7.9 percent. Left-wing candidates currently trail in the polls. Those intending to cast blank ballots and those who chose not to participate in the polls account for 50 percent of the electorate, a trend also observed in countries such as Bolivia and Costa Rica. The election will be held in Colombia on May 31, 2026, with a probable second round on June 21. Political violence and the decline of its institutions characterizes this election. Many believe that Colombian President Petro, a former guerrilla member, has prioritized the interests of drug traffickers and armed groups over the needs of the people. Turbay, a young Colombian senator and the leading opposition candidate, tragically lost his life in August after being shot during a political rally in June. He was a member of the Democratic Centre party. Before his death, he was projected to win the election with 13.7 percent of the vote. He was followed by journalist Davila, also from the right, with 11.5 percent. Third was the leftist Bolivar (10.5 percent) and fourth was centrist Fajardo (8.7 percent). On July 28, former President Velez was convicted in the first instance for allegedly bribing witnesses. He also belongs to the Democratic Centre party. In Brazil election will take place on October 4, 2026, with a likely runoff on October 25. If former President Bolsonaro had not been disqualified due to his trial over an alleged coup plot, the race would be between him and President da Silva, who, despite his age (79 years), has announced his intention to run for a fourth term. Lula leads in first-round voting intentions and would tie with Sao Paulo Governor Freitas in a potential runoff; however, this scenario would change if Mr. Bolsonaro were to run. On July 9, President Trump threatened Brazil with a 50 percent tariff, accusing President da Silva of conducting a witch hunt against Mr. Bolsonaro. In response to “U.S. interventionism’ Lula has used this threat to invoke Brazilian nationalism. The Brazilian president has efforts to promote the creation of a new international currency to compete with the U.S. dollar through BRICS, and to grow political and trade relationship between Brazil and China. It seems unlikely that Lula will back down from his persecution of Mr. Bolsonaro. This stance is raising concerns that the country is moving toward an authoritarian system where the judiciary serves the executive branch. Consequently, social protests are erupting across the country Most likely: Latin America shifts to the right, the right wing is poised to secure victories in all seven upcoming elections, including the second rounds. In four countries – Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica and Peru – the left wing concedes defeat. In Honduras, Colombia and Brazil, socialists attempt to disrupt the electoral process through violence and lawfare, employing tactics such as physical intimidation and manipulative legal challenges. Despite these efforts, they fail to secure power for themselves. Latin American governments and the Trump administration collaborate on joint efforts against organized crime. Less likely: Political polarization in Latin America. Right-wing parties secure victories in Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica and Peru. Left-wing governments maintain power in Honduras, Colombia and Brazil. This division across the continent creates two opposing camps, which could give organized crime groups greater political support. Lula could emerge as a key figure in opposing President Trump’s policies in the region. /Source: Geopolitical Intelligence Services (GIS) – Liechtenstein/
by Esclusa
.